Post by ScottCool on Aug 4, 2010 1:21:00 GMT -5
That likes the vikes the same if more more without farve?
Im ean sure the guys a legend........but he's no manning, Brady or brees. and what I mean by that is the touchdown to Interception ratio.
Farve-1.6
Brady-2.2
Brees-1.8
Manning-2.0
SO what, who cares he has the TD record, he also owns the int one too. Then he's played so long he should own those records. Okay still not convinced?
Another record is most wins by a starting QB: 181 in the regular season. but he also lost 104 in that time. so he's only won 77 more. and how many superbowl rings? just 1?
Brady has 3, Big Ben has 2, The manning brothers and brees each have one. And farve is so great why?
So you think because he played great last year he's still "great", look the guy is 40....... 40! he might still have a few years in him. but sooner or later he becomes "old" and will become fragile and be more harm then help. remember that overtime loss to the Saints in last years playoffs?
Sure the Vikes dont have a QB thats really good to play. But you dont nned one. you just need a decent one to keep the pace while you RUN THE BALL! I mean you have one of the best Rb's in the league on your team and a DAMN good D! I mean you have everything else. then you have a really good rookie RB in Gerhart. Split the carries and run more. Jackson will be a okay QB, so play him while your running game is still great so he'll have less pressure. I mean you have a great WR core for him to throw to and a good line. I mean greenbay did it, sure Rogers is a elite QB. But they don't have the O-line the vikes do, or the D in my opinion.
Then to end my rant, a 40yr old QB who causes all this drama every year and doesn't report to camp till what seems like a day before the season starts is not good for your team. its a distraction and unfair. the vikes will dot great without farve once they realize they don't need him.
Im ean sure the guys a legend........but he's no manning, Brady or brees. and what I mean by that is the touchdown to Interception ratio.
Farve-1.6
Brady-2.2
Brees-1.8
Manning-2.0
SO what, who cares he has the TD record, he also owns the int one too. Then he's played so long he should own those records. Okay still not convinced?
Another record is most wins by a starting QB: 181 in the regular season. but he also lost 104 in that time. so he's only won 77 more. and how many superbowl rings? just 1?
Brady has 3, Big Ben has 2, The manning brothers and brees each have one. And farve is so great why?
So you think because he played great last year he's still "great", look the guy is 40....... 40! he might still have a few years in him. but sooner or later he becomes "old" and will become fragile and be more harm then help. remember that overtime loss to the Saints in last years playoffs?
Sure the Vikes dont have a QB thats really good to play. But you dont nned one. you just need a decent one to keep the pace while you RUN THE BALL! I mean you have one of the best Rb's in the league on your team and a DAMN good D! I mean you have everything else. then you have a really good rookie RB in Gerhart. Split the carries and run more. Jackson will be a okay QB, so play him while your running game is still great so he'll have less pressure. I mean you have a great WR core for him to throw to and a good line. I mean greenbay did it, sure Rogers is a elite QB. But they don't have the O-line the vikes do, or the D in my opinion.
Then to end my rant, a 40yr old QB who causes all this drama every year and doesn't report to camp till what seems like a day before the season starts is not good for your team. its a distraction and unfair. the vikes will dot great without farve once they realize they don't need him.
